Students practise the three Paper 2 source question types (single source, compare two sources, and how far do sources support) and get structured feedback straight away. Teachers get a live dashboard of who is engaging, who needs support, and a source and question library that grows year on year.
Every part of the form mirrors real exam technique, not a generic quiz layout.
Single source, compare two sources, and how far do sources support, each with its own writing guide and hints, matched to how it is actually marked.
Provenance (who produced a source, when, and why) drives the mark scheme more than the source format does, so context is required and source type is optional.
Hints and instant structured feedback check for quotations, comparative language and reliability judgements, so students can improve an answer before a teacher ever sees it.
Engagement by student, a recent-activity feed, and an automatic "may need support" list, so a struggling student doesn't go unnoticed for weeks.
Add a source once (with an uploaded image for visual sources), attach exam questions to it, and reuse both across year groups every year after.
No student work is sent to a third party. The whole thing is self-hosted, so it sits comfortably alongside your school's existing data and privacy policies.
From a blank source to a reviewed answer, in three steps.
A teacher builds a library of sources (text or image) and attaches Paper 2 questions to them, ready for the class.
A student picks a question, reads its sources, and writes with a writing guide, hints and instant feedback available the whole time.
Submissions land in the teacher dashboard with engagement tracking, so review time goes to the students who need it most.